The teaching of academic writing to English as a second language students: A functional genre-based approach
Keywords:
genre-based pedagogy, L2 students, academic discourse, cross-cultural variationAbstract
This paper reviews how genre-based pedagogy has been conceived by researchers in the different scholarly traditions, and offers a particular view of genre-driven pedagogy and its practical applications in the English as a Second Language student classroom. This view of a genre-based teaching approach largely consists in a prior discussion with students of the socio-cultural context in which a particular academic genre occurs. This discovery process of the social circumstances that surround a genre can help students understand more readily the communicative purpose of a specific genre. A second complementary stage should be the explicit teaching of functions and language structures of typical academic texts, with a special emphasis on cross-cultural variation. By making learners aware of the similarities and differences in the rhetorical strategies preferred by the members of different disciplinary communities, L2 writers may feel more confident about the rhetorical options they can choose depending on the context and type of audience they are addressing.
Downloads
References
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wi: University of Wisconsin Press.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes, 16, 313-319.
Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow: Longman.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles.
English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47-59.
Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196-215). Harlow: Longman.
Burgess, S., & Cargill, M. (2013). Using genre analysis and corpus linguistics to teach research article writing. In V. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting research writing: Roles and challenges in multilingual settings (pp. 55-71). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Burgess, S., & Fagan, A. (2002). (Kid) gloves on or off?: Academic conflict in research articles across the disciplines. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 79-96.
Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Common-core and specific approaches to the teaching of academic writing. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 293-312). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). Issues in EAP: A preliminary perspective. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 8-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric (pp. 1-15). London: Taylor and Francis.
García-Mayo, M. P. (2000). English for specific purposes: Discourse analysis and course design. Universidad del País Vasco.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse. Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of
Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-720.
Jacoby, S., Leech, D., & Holten, C. (1995). A genre-based developmental writing course for undergraduate ESL science majors. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 351-373). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Johns, A. M. (1995). Teaching classroom and authentic genres: Initiating students into academic cultures and discourses. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 277-292). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009). (Non-) critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: A cross-cultural study of evaluation. In K. Hyland, & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 143-160). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The rhetoric of the abstract in English and Spanish scientific discourse: A cross-cultural genre-analytic approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
Martín-Martín, P. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8, 133-152.
Martín-Martín, P., & León Pérez, I. (forthcoming). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as a social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167. (1994). Reprinted in A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). London: Taylor and Francis.
Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text, 18, 545-585.
Moreno, A. I. (2011). English for research publication purposes and crosscultural academic discourse analysis. In J. Ruano, M. Fernández, M. Borham, M. Díaz, S. Bautista, P. Álvarez & B. García (Eds.), Current trends in Anglophone studies: Cultural, linguistic and literary research (pp. 53-69). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Moreno, A. I., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., López-Navarro, I., & Sachdev, I. (2012). Spanish researchers’ perceived difficulty writing research articles for English-medium journals: The impact of proficiency in English versus publication experience. Ibérica, 24, 157-184.
Mur Dueñas, P. (2010). A contrastive analysis of research article introductions in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 61, 119-133.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Academic literacies and changing university communities. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 15-28.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139-160.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149-170.
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 238-251.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. English for Academic Purposes, 7, 250-263.
Ventola, E. (1997). Modalization: Probability - an exploration into its role in academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles in academic discourse (pp.157-180). Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Williams, I. A. (1999). Results section of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.
Yunick, S. (1997). Genres, registers and sociolinguistics. World Englishes, 16, 321-336.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista de Lenguas para fines específicos is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
