The impact of technology-mediated scaffolding on the development of EFL learners’ speaking components. El impacto del andamiaje mediado por tecnología en el desarrollo de los componentes de habla de los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera

doi.org/10.20420/ElGuiniguada.2022.505

Palabras clave: ANDAMIAJE MEDIADO POR TECNOLOGÍA, DESARROLLO DEL HABLA, ESTUDIANTES DE EFL IRANÍES

Resumen

The present study attempted to survey the effect of technology-mediated scaffolding on the development of second language speaking components (fluency, coherence, lexical resources, grammatical range, and accuracy, and pronunciation) among Iranian intermediate EFL adult learners. To do so, 60 intermediate level female students with the age range of 18 to 25 in the EFL research center in Tehran were selected from among 90 intermediate students according to their performance in a standard version of the Preliminary English Test (PET). The selected participants were divided into two groups, namely the experimental group (EG) in which the learners received technology-mediated teaching through Telegram application, and the control group (CG), who followed the conventional teaching/learning methods of L2 speaking. The participants went through the process of pre-testing, intervention, and post-testing. Then, the data collected were analyzed, and multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) was run to probe the null-hypotheses. The outcome of the post-test data analyses clarified that technology-mediated scaffolding had a statistically significant effect on the speaking sub-skills such as fluency, lexical resource, grammatical range and accuracy, and pronunciation of Iranian EFL learners.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1-34.

Baker, F. S. (2015). Emerging realities of text-to-speech software for nonnative-English-speaking community college students in the freshman year. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(5), 423-441.

Bechhofer, F., & Paterson, L. (2012). Principles of research design in the social sciences. Routledge.

Bruner, J., & Olson, D. (1973). Learning through experience and learning through media. Prospects, 3(1), 20-38.

Burbules, N. C., & Callister Jr., T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Westview Press.

Carte, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching approaches: An overview. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 2, 3-10.

Chen, C., Toh, S., & Ismail, W. (2005). Are learning styles relevant to virtual reality? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 123-141.

Dehoney, J., & Reeves, T. (1999). Instructional and social dimensions of class web pages. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 19-41.

Ellis, R. (2008). Principles of instructed second language acquisition. Asian EFL Journal. http://asian-efl-journal.com/sept_05_re.pdf

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS, statistics for statistics (4th ed.). SAGE.

Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today in the classroom today. The Education Arcade. http://education.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/GamesSimsSocNets_EdArcade.pdf

Kim, Y. S. G., Park, C., & Park, Y. (2015). Dimensions of discourse level oral language skills and their relation to reading comprehension and written composition: an exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 633-654.

Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. School Psychology International, 23(1), 7-35.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press.

Kung, F. W. (2013). Bilingualism and the second generation: Investigating the effects and methods of heritage language maintenance and second language acquisition. English Teaching Journal, 37(3), 107-145.

Larsen, R. E. (1992). Relationship of learning style to the effectiveness and acceptance of interactive video instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19(11), 17-21.

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Newbury House Publishers.

Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O., & Oren, A. (2000). Web-based learning environments: Current pedagogical and technological state. Journal of research on computing in education, 33(1), 55-76.

Mirahmadi, S. H., & Alavi, S. M. (2016). The effect of traditional scaffolding treatments on the Iranian EFL learners’ performance on the speaking sub-skills of pronunciation, fluency, lexicon, and grammar. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(2), 155-168.

Nguyen, M. H. (2013). EFL students’ reflections on peer scaffolding in making a collaborative oral presentation. English Language Teaching, 6(4), 64-73.

Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11(2), 111-126.

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 18 (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Patel, D. S. (2011). Significance of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) in language classes. Journal of Technology for ELT, 4(2), 112-121.

Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 115-132). Newbury House.

Ragan, T., & Smith, P. (1996). Soft technologies: Instructional and informational design research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational telecommunications and technology (pp. 541-569). MacMillan.

Sadeghi, B., & Maleki, M. (2015). Improving the ability of writing argumentative essays of Iranian EFL learners by raising awareness of rhetoric transfer. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36(3), 1541-1559.

Winnips, K., & McLoughlin, C. (2000). Applications and categorization of software-based scaffolding. In J. Bourdeau & R. Heller (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications 2000 (pp. 1798-1799). AACE.

Yang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y., & Tseng, S. S. (2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 63, 285-305.

Publicado
2022-07-07
Cómo citar
Abedi, N. (2022). The impact of technology-mediated scaffolding on the development of EFL learners’ speaking components. El impacto del andamiaje mediado por tecnología en el desarrollo de los componentes de habla de los estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera. El G U I N I G U a D a, 31, 54-68. Recuperado a partir de https://ojsspdc.ulpgc.es/ojs/index.php/ElGuiniguada/article/view/1370
Sección
A modo de monográfico/About a topic