Tracing the origins of ESP in Old English Ælfric's Colloquy and Cosmology
Keywords:
English for Specific Purposes, Old English genres of secular instruction and of scientific knowledge, Old English origins of texts for specific purposesAbstract
The present paper will analyse two different pieces by Ælfric, perhaps one of the leading prose-writers of the Old English period. These are, namely, his Cosmology –which may have been completed towards the year 993 (Burnley, 1992)–, and his Colloquy on the Occupations –composed a few years afterwards. These stand for two of the few writings that may be regarded as scientific prose in Old English, at a time when most of the prose works –not only scientific– were rendered in Latin, and when the greatest prose genres in Old English corresponded to history, philosophy or oratory. These two pieces are admittedly heterogeneous: on the one hand, the Cosmology may be said to combine aspects of both a religious and a scientific register; on the other hand, Ælfric’s Colloquy must have been intended as a companion to his Latin Grammar (Mitchell and Robinson, 1964/2007). Yet, as these authors also note, the work also offers us an overall panorama of the social structure of that time. Concretely, this means that certain characters speak about the main aspects of their trades. It is this feature that makes us approach this text as a kind of forerunner of a text in the sphere of “English for Specific Purposes”. In any case, it may be expected that many of the characteristic traits of Present Day English ESP texts will not apply, among other things, because of the differences in morphology and sentence structure between the two diachronic varieties. The two texts will be studied, with a view to offering a contrastive analysis of their characteristic features with those recurrent traits of Present-day English professional texts.
Downloads
References
Anderson, E. A. (1974). Social idealism in Ælfric’s Colloquy. Anglo-Saxon England,
, 153-162.
Aristotle 1971 (ca. 330 BC). Poetics. In Hazard Adams, (Eds.), Critical theory since
Plato (pp. 47-66). San Diego: Harcourt.
Aristotle 1991 (384-322 BC). The art of rhetoric. (Edward P. J. Corbett, Ed.).
Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London and New York: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2001). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. IBÉRICA, 3, 3-17. <http://www.aelfe.org/documents/text4-Bhatia.pdf> [Last accessed: 20-02-2011].
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 161–174.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Burnley, D. 1993 (1992). The history of the English language. A source book. London
and New York: Longman.
Burrow, J. (1982). Medieval writers and their work: Middle English literature and its
background 1100-1500. Oxford: OUP.
Chandler, D. (1997). An introduction to genre theory. <http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/intgenre/intgenre.html> [Last accessed: 19-02-11].
Cuddon, J. A. 1985 (1976). A dictionary of literary terms. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Downing, A. (1996). Register and/or Genre? In I. Vázquez & A. Hornero (Eds.), Current issues in genre theory (pp. 11-27). Zaragoza: Mira Editores.
Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Garmonsway, G. N. (Ed.). 1999 (1939). Ælfric’s Colloquy. University of Exeter Press.
Gotti, M. (2001). The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 221-239.
Gunnarsson, B. L. (2008). Professional communication. In: N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education. 2nd. ed. Vol. 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 83-95). Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, E. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: CUP.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116-127.
Jauss, H. R. (1979). The alterity and modernity of medieval literature. New Literary History, 10, 181-229.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge: CUP.
Kohnen, T. (2001). On defining text types within Historical Linguistics: The
case of petitions/statutes. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 197-203.
Lafuente-Millán, E., Mur-Dueñas, P., Lorés-Sanz, R. & Vázquez-Orta, I. (2010). Interpersonality in written academic discourse: Three analytical perspectives. In Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente-Millán, E. (Eds.), Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic discourse (pp.13-20). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. & Lafuente-Millán, E. (Eds.). (2010a). Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. & Lafuente-Millán, E. (2010b). Introduction. Constructing interpersonality: multiple perspectives on written academic discourse (pp. 1-10). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Malone, K. & Baugh, A. C. 1989 (1967). A literary history of England I: The Middle Ages. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mantello, F. A. C. & A. G. Rigg. 1999 (1996). Medieval Latin. An introduction and bibliographic guide. The Catholic University of America Press.
Meurman-Solin, A. (2001). Genre as a variable in sociohistorical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 241-256.
Mitchell, B. & Robinson, F. C. 2007 (1964). A guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Moessner, L. (2001). Genre, text type, style, register: A terminological maze? European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 131-138.
Pahta, P. (2001). Creating a new genre: Contextual dimensions in the production and transmission of early scientific writing. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 205-220.
Quirk, R. et al. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: CUP.
Sherburne, G. & Bond, D. F. 1980 (1967). A literary history of England III: The
Restoration and the eighteenth century. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: a re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.),
ESP: State of the art. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Swales, J. (1988). Episodes in ESP. Hemel-Hempstead: Prentice-Hall International.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP.
Swales, J. (2009). Genre in a changing world. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo. (Eds.), Perspectives on writing. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, <http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/> and <http://www3.unisul.br/paginas/ensino/pos/linguagem/cd/English/15i.pdf> [Last accessed: 07/01/2011].
Sweet, H. (1897). First steps in Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: OUP.
Taavitsainen, I. (1997). Genre conventions: Personal affect in fiction and non-fiction in Early Modern English. In M. Rissanen, M. Kytö & K. Heikkonen (Eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in linguistic variation and genre styles (pp. 185-266). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, I. (2001). Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 139-150.
Taavitsainen, I. (2004). Genres of secular instruction: a linguistic history of useful entertainment. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 29, 75-94.
Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
Trimble, L. (1985). English for science and technology. A discourse approach. Cambridge:
CUP.
Van Dijk, T. (1972). A note on linguistic macrostructures. Paper 7th Linguistic Colloquium, Nijmegen, 1972. In A. P. Ten Cate & P. Jordens, (Eds.), Linguistische Perspektiven (pp.75-87). Tübingen: Niemeyer. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/A%20Note%20on%20Linguistic% 20Macro-structures.pdf>.
Van Dijk, T. (1976). Narrative macrostructures. Cognitive and logical foundations. PTL 1, 547-568. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Narrative%20macrostructures.pdf>.
Van Dijk, T. (1977). Pragmatic macrostructures in discourse and cognition. In M. de Mey, et al., (Eds.), CC 77 (pp. 99-113). University of Ghent, 1977. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 16-02-2011]. <http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Pragmatic%20macrostructures%20 in%20discourse%20and%20cognition.pdf>.
Van Dijk, T. (1995). On macrostructures, mental models and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-Van Dijk theory. In Weaver III, Ch., Suzanne Mannes, S. & Fletcher, C. R. (Eds.), Discourse comprehension. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 383-410). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. <http://www.discourses.org/> [Last accessed: 21-02-2011].<http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/On%20Macrostructures,%20Men tal%20Models%20and%20Other%20Inventions.pdf>.
Varela Bravo, E. J. (1998). Relevance: A pragmatic analysis of a passage from Ælfric’s Colloquy. Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lengua y Literatura Medieval (SELIM) (pp. 293-308). Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
Varela Bravo, E. J. (2000). Relevance: A pragmatic analysis of a passage from Ælfric’s Colloquy 9 years after. In A.M. Hornero & M.P. Navarro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th. International Conference of SELIM. Actas del X Congreso Internacional de SELIM (pp. 277-288). Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.
Ward, A. W. & Trent, W. P. et al. 2000 (1907-21). The Cambridge history of british and American literature: An encyclopaedia in eighteen volumes. Cambridge and New York: CUP & G.P. Putnam’s Sons. <http://www.bartleby.com/br/211.html> [Last accessed: 12-02-2011].
Werlich, E. (1982). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista de Lenguas para fines específicos is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
