Constituent Structure and sino

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20420/PhilCan.2017.146

Keywords:

coordination, contrastive negation, sino, constituent structure

Abstract

This article shows that, despite appearances, the structures associated to No vi a Juan sino a María (I didn't see Juan, but María) and Vi no a Juan sino a María (I saw not Juan but María) are different. While it is possible to accept a standard analysis in the first case, the second structure displays properties which are surprising if one assumes that a Juan ‘to Juan’ is an argument of the predicate. This work argues that in the second structure the negated element and the corrective coda form one single constituent where sino acts as a relational head.

Supponting Agencies

This article is part of two research projects funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Government of Spain [Project codes: FFI2013-41509-P and FFI2014-56968-C4-2-P].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antonio Fábregas, Universitetet i Tromsø

Antonio Fábregas is Professor of Spanish Language at UiT Norges arktiske universitet in Tromsø, Norway.

References

BOSQUE, I. 1997. “Preposición tras preposición”, en Almeida, M. y Dorta, J. (eds.), Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica. Homenaje al Profesor Ramón Trujillo. Tenerife: Editorial Montesinos, 133-155.

BOSSONG, G. 1985. Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in der neuiranischen Sprachen. Tubinga: Narr.

CAHA, P. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. Tesis doctoral inédita. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.

CHUNG, S. y LADUSAW, W. 2003. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

CINQUE, G. 2005. "Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and its Exceptions", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 315-332.

COLLINS, C. y POSTAL, P. 2014. Classical NEG Raising: An Essay on the Syntax of Negation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

COLLINS, C. 2016. “Not Even”, Natural Language Semantics, 24(4), 291-303.

DEMIRDACHE, H. y URIBE-ETXEBARRIA, M. 2000. “The Primitives of Temporal Relations”, en Martin, R., Michaels, D., y Uriagereka, J. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 157-186.

GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ, R. 2008. La polaridad positiva en español. Tesis doctoral. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

GRIMSHAW, J. 2005. “Extended Projections”, en Grimshaw, J. (ed.), Words and Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1-74.

GROSS, M. 1977. “Une analyse non présuppositionelle de l'effet contrastif”, Linguisticae investigationes, 1, 39-61.

HALE, K. y KEYSER, S. J. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

HORN, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

JESPERSEN, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhaguen: A. F. Høst.

KLEIN, W. 1994. Time in Language. Londres: Routledge.

MATEU, J. 2002. Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-semantics Interface. Tesis doctoral. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

MCCAWLEY, J. 1991. “Contrastive Negation and Metalinguistic Negation”, Chicago Linguistic Society, 27, 189-206.

MONTAGUE, R. 1970. “English as a Formal Language”, en Visentini, B. et al. (eds.), Linguaggi nella Societa et nella Technica. Milán: Edizioni di Communita, 188-221.

NEELEMAN, A. y WEERMAN, F. 1999. Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments. Dordrecht: Springer.

SÁNCHEZ LÓPEZ, C. 1999. “La negación”, en Bosque, I y Demonte, V. (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, 2561-2635.

WILTSCHKO, M. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ZAMPARELLI, R. 2000. Layers in the Determiner Phrase. Nueva York: Garland.

Published

2017-06-26

How to Cite

Fábregas, A. (2017). Constituent Structure and sino. Philologica Canariensia, 23, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.20420/PhilCan.2017.146

Issue

Section

Articles