The Present Indicative in Spanish and the Cognitive Perspective: Subjectification and Dominions of Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20420/PhilCan.2018.199Keywords:
cognitive linguistics, present indicative, subjectification, dominion of epistemic control, dominion of effective control, dynamic evolutionary modelAbstract
The following article analyzes the present indicative in Spanish (the HABLO paradigm) from the perspective of dominions of control and the degree of subjectification that can be attributed to its different uses. Working with Langacker’s dynamic evolutionary model (1991), we conclude that it is possible to establish the central value of this paradigm on the basis of the concept of dominion of perceptive control.
Supporting Agencies
This article is part of a research project funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [Project code: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000734].
Downloads
References
ACHARD, M. 2000. “Selección de modo en construcciones oracionales de complemento”, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 1, pp. 153-173.
BERMÚDEZ, F. 2006. Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Tesis doctoral. Estocolmo: Stockholms Universitet.
BERMÚDEZ, F. 2011. “El pluscuamperfecto como marcador evidencial en castellano”, en Hernández Socas, E., Sinner, C., y Wotjak, G. (eds.), Estudios de tiempo y espacio en la gramática española. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 43-62.
BERMÚDEZ, F. 2016. “Rumores y otros malos hábitos. El condicional evidencial en español”, Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, 3(2), pp. 35-69.
BRIZ, A. 2004. “Notas sobre los llamados usos temporales ‘dislocados’ en la conversación coloquial”, ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante, Anexo 2, pp. 43-53.
CASTAÑEDA CASTRO, A. 2004. “Una visión cognitiva del sistema temporal y modal del verbo en español”, ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante, Anexo 2, pp. 55-71.
CORNILLIE, B. 2006. “Conceptual and constructional considerations on the subjectivity of English and Spanish modals”, en Athanasiadou, A., Canakis, C., y Cornillie, B. (eds.), Subjectification: various paths to subjectivity. Berlín/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 177-205.
FAUCONNIER, G. 1985. Mental spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.
FAUCONNIER, G. 1997. Mappings in thoughts and language. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
KRATOCHVÍLOVÁ, D. 2013. “Las relaciones entre el significado modal real y el significado modal potencial en español”, Linguistica Pragensia, 19(2), pp. 73-83.
KRATOCHVÍLOVÁ, D. 2018 (en prensa). Modality in Spanish and combinations of modal meanings. Praga: Karolinum.
LANGACKER, R. W. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar (2). Berlín/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.
LANGACKER, R. W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
LANGACKER, R. W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlín/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.
LANGACKER, R. W. 2006. “Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes”, en Athanasiadou, A., Canakis, C., y Cornillie, B. (eds.), Subjectification: various paths to subjectivity. Berlín/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 17-40.
LANGACKER, R. W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
LANGACKER, R. W. 2017. “Evidentiality in cognitive grammar”, en Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., y Carretero, M. (eds.), Evidentiality revisited. Amsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins, pp. 13-55.
LAURENCIO TACORONTE, A. 2016. “¿Designan las formas gramaticales algo más allá de la misma lengua? El caso del presente de indicativo y el presente de la perífrasis {estar + -ndo} en español”, Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philologica, 3, pp. 183-195.
MATTE BON, F. 2006. “Maneras de hablar del futuro en español entre gramática y pragmática. Futuro, ir + infinitivo y presente de indicativo: análisis, usos y valor profundo”, RedELE, 6.
MATTE BON, F. 2007. “Las maneras de hablar del futuro en español: del sistema codificado a las interpretaciones contextuales”, MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera, 5. Disponible en: https://marcoele.com/las-maneras-de-hablar-del-futuro-en-espanol-del-sistema-codificado-a-las-interpretaciones-contextuales/.
MEJÍAS-BIKANDI, E. 2009. “Conditional sentences and mood in Spanish”, Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), pp. 163-172.
RAE. 2016. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI (CORPES). Disponible en: http://www.rae.es.
RAE. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
RUIZ CAMPILLO, J. P. 2014. “La lógica del espacio. Un mapa operativo del sistema verbal en español”, Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 1(1), pp. 62-85.
VEIGA, A. 1987. “El presente histórico como hecho de sistema verbal”, Verba, 14, pp. 169-216.
VEIGA, A. 1991. Condicionales, concesivas y modo verbal en español. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
VESTERINEN, R. 2014. “Extending the dominion of effective control – Its applicability to mood choice in Spanish and Portuguese”, Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), pp. 583-616.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Philologica Canariensia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Philologica Canariensia is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional.
Philologica Canariensia allows authors to retain unrestricted copyright and to retain it in the future.
The author is allowed to deposit the publisher's PDF version on his or her personal website, in an institutional or subject repository or in an social network. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
1.png)
1.png)
