The Proem of Dionysius of Halicarnassus's Roman Antiquities: Notes on the First Steps Toward Historiographic Classicism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20420/PhilCan.2014.0022

Keywords:

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Classicism, style, proem

Abstract

This article examines the structural criteria of the proem of Dionysius’ Roman Antiquities, with special attention to their relation with the author’s ideas about the general proem of Thucydides. It also pays attention to the phrase, in order to define the stylistic rules of the proem and its place in the literary polemic of Dionysius’ time.

Supporting Agencies

This articles is part of a research project funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Government of Spain [Project code: FFI2011–27501].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Horrillo, Universidad de Zaragoza

Miguel Ángel Rodríguez Horrillo is Associate Professor in the area of Greek Philology at the Universidad de Zaragoza, attached to the Department of Antiquity Sciences.

References

AUJAC, G. 2002. Denys d’Halicarnasse, Opuscules rhétoriques, tome IV: Thucydide. Seconde letterà Ammée, París: Les Belles–lettres.

BENSELER, G. E. 1841. De hiatu in oratoribus atticis et historicis graecis libri duo, Friburgo: J. G. Engelhardt.

BOMPAIRE, J. 1958. Lucien écrivain, imitation et creation, París : E. de Boccard.

BONNER, S. F. 1939. The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BOWERSOCK, G. W. 1979. Augustus and the Greek World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DENNISTON, J. D. 1954. The Greek Particles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DIHLE, A. 1957. “Analogie und Attizismus”, Hermes 85: 170-205.

EK, S. 1942. Herodotismen in der Archaologie des Dionys von Halikarnass: ein Beitrag zur Be-leuchtung des beginnenden Klassizismus, Lund: Hakan.

ERBSE, H. 1979. “Über das Prooimion (1, 1-23) des ThukydideischenGeschichtswerkes”, en Ausgewahlte Schriften zur klassischen Philologie, Berlín: DeGruyter, 245-268. (Versión revisada del original publicado en RhM 133: 43–69).

FOX, M. 1993. “History and Rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, JHS 83: 31-47.

FROMENTIN, V. 2002. Denys d’Halicarnasse, Antiquités romaines, tome I: Introduction générale. Livre I, París: Les Belles–lettres.

GABBA, E. 1996. Dionigi e la Storia di Roma Arcaica, Bari: Edipuglia.

GABBA, E. 1998. Cultura classica e storiografia moderna, Bolonia: Il Mulino.

GELZER, T. 1979. “Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus” en H. Flashar, Ed., Leclassicisme à Rome aux Iersiècles avant et après J. C., Ginebra: Fondation Hardt, 1-55.

HAMMOND, N. G. L. 1952. “The arrangement of thought in the proem and in otherparts of Thucydides”, CQ N. S. 2: 127-142.

HEAT, M. 1989. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus On Imitation”, Hermes 117: 370-3.

JACOBY, C. 1874. Über die Sprache des Dionysius von Halikarnass in der Römischen Archaeologie, Aarau: H. R. Sauerländer.

KÜHNER, R. y GERTH, B. 1904. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechische Sprache, zweiter Teil: Satzlehre, zweiter Band, Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.

LASSERRE, F. 1979. “Prose grecque classicisante” en H. Flashar, Ed., Le classicisme à Romeaux Ier siècles avant et après J. C., Ginebra: Fondation Hardt, 135-163.

LÓPEZ EIRE, A. 1985. “Formalización y desarrollo de la prosa griega”, en G. Morocho Gayo (cord.), Estudios de prosa griega, León: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de León: 37-64.

LÓPEZ EIRE, A. 1991. Ático, koiné y aticismo: estudios sobre Aristófanes y Libanio, Murcia: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.

MARTIN, P. 1969. “Le dessein de Denys d’Halicarnasse dans les “Antiquités romaines” et sa conception de l’histoire à travers sa préface du livre I”, Caesarodunum 4: 197-209.

MARTIN, P. 1993. Denys d’Halicarnasse, historien des origines de Rome, Toulouse: Presses Universitaires.

OAKLEY, S. 2010. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Livy on the Horatii and the Curiatii”, en C. Pellig, J. Marincola y C. S. Kraus (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its contexts, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 118-139.

PRITCHETT, W. K. 1975. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides. English translation, basedon the Greek text of Usener–Radermacher with commentary, Los Ángeles–Londres: University of California Press.

RADERMACHER, L. 1899. “Studien zur Geschichte der griechischen Rhetorik”, RhM, 54: 351-380.

RODRÍGUEZ HORRILLO, M. A. 2010. “La leyenda de los Horacios”, Habis 41: 65-83.

SACKS, K. S. 1982. “Historiography in the Rhetorical works of Dionysius of Halicar-nassus”, Athenaeum XLI: 65-87.

SCHULZE, C. (2000), “Authority, Originality and Competence in the Roman Archaeologyof Dionysius of Halicarnassus”, Histos, IV.

SICKING, C. M. J. 1993. “Devices for text articulation in Lysias I and XII”, en C. M. J. Sicking y J. M. van Ophuijsen, Two studies in Attic prose usage, Lysias and Plato, Leiden: Brill, 3-68.

SWAIN, S. 1996. Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and power in the Greek world, AD 50-250, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TOYE, D. L. 1995. “Dionysius of Halicarnassus on the first Greek historians”, AJP 116: 279-302.

USHER, S. 1960. “Some observations on Greek Historical Narrative from 400 to 1 B.C.”, AJP, 81: 358-370.

USHER, S. 1982. “The Style of Dionysius of Halicarnassus in the Antiquitates Romanae”, en ANRW II 30, 1: 816-837.

WILAMOWITZ, U. VON. 1900. “Asianismus und Atticismus”, Hermes 35: 1-52.

Published

2015-11-01

How to Cite

Rodríguez Horrillo, M. Ángel. (2015). The Proem of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’s Roman Antiquities: Notes on the First Steps Toward Historiographic Classicism. Philologica Canariensia, 20, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.20420/PhilCan.2014.0022

Issue

Section

Articles